20031016-bendiksen-mw08-collection-002
20031016-bendiksen-mw08-collection-003
20031016-bendiksen-mw08-collection-004
20031016-bendiksen-mw08-collection-005
20031016-bendiksen-mw08-collection-006
20031016-bendiksen-mw08-collection-007
20031016-bendiksen-mw08-collection-008
20031016-bendiksen-mw08-collection-009
20031016-bendiksen-mw08-collection-010
20031016-bendiksen-mw08-collection-011
Jonas Bendiksen is a magazine photographer based in New York City. Born in Norway in 1977, he moved to Russia in 1998 and lived in that country for two years while pursuing stories that lay outside the general news beat.
Bendiksen, who has studied Russian and Arabic, continues to photograph the former Soviet Union and Central Asia as well as the Middle East. His photo essays appear in many international publications, including The Sunday Times Magazine (London), GEO, Newsweek, and Mother Jones.
He was awarded the 2002 Nikon/Sunday Times Magazine Ian Parry Memorial Award, the 2003 Infinity Award from the International Center of Photography, and first prize in the University of Missouri’s 2003 Pictures of the Year awards.
Jonas Bendiksen
These photographs explore some of the most crucial issues facing former Soviet Central Asia, viewed through the prism of its most fertile and populous region, the Ferghana Valley.
Central Asia, portrayed either as a war zone or an exotic destination for adventuresome travelers, has long fascinated me. With this project I set out to find another Central Asia, one still searching for its post-Soviet identity. The former USSR, once considered a utopia by some and the Evil Empire by others, has always been enigmatic to outsiders. The Ferghana Valley, shared by Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan, is a crossroads between old and new myths.
The division of the valley among the three countries, a result of Joseph Stalin’s gerrymandering, is impractical in a postcommunist Central Asia. Borders, once fluid, are now difficult to cross and rife with tension.
After the fall of communism, most of the valley’s people turned back to their Muslim roots. Governments reacted differently to the new political force of Islam. Tajikistan endured a civil war before agreeing to power sharing with the Islamic party. Kyrgyzstan adopted a relatively liberal position toward the Islamic opposition.
In Uzbekistan, President Islam Karimov, fearing the rise of political Islam and extremist insurgents, reacted by repressing Islam as a whole. Today ordinary Muslim behavior such as praying in public, growing beards, or dressing in Islamic garb is likely to result in arrests, charges of extremism, and up to 18 years in prison. A United Nations special envoy recently reported that many of the 6,000 political and religious prisoners in Uzbekistan are the victims of the “systematic use of torture.” As a result, religion has been forced underground into the hands of two fundamentalist organizations that share a common goal: the creation of an Islamic state in the Ferghana Valley. While they receive their greatest support from the Uzbeks, these organizations also have a support base in the other countries of the valley.
The most popular of these forbidden organizations, the Hizb-ut-Tahrir, has become a refuge for the voiceless and the poor. Organized as a cell-based secret society, it claims to be nonviolent, but is labeled a terrorist group by the Uzbek government, the premier regional partner of the United States in the war against terrorism. However, to many of its members, the Hizb-ut-Tahrir offers the only way for them to live out their Muslim identity.
This climate of fear and confusion—who is the terrorist and who is the wrongfully arrested political prisoner?—is amplified by the valley’s numerous other problems. The economy has deteriorated under the weight of plummeting cotton prices. Border and ethnic disputes continue to erupt. And the drug trade is flourishing, with the cities of the Ferghana Valley serving as hubs for smugglers from Afghanistan and Pakistan on their way to Russia and Europe.
The problems of the Ferghana Valley and what they reveal about Central Asia remain too perilous for the rest of the world to ignore.
—Jonas Bendiksen, October 2003